What is the outcome of implementing LEED certification on taxpayers?

  

I need two page talks about the LEED program rising concernsthis is an example which aboutZero Energy BuildingsThe reason why I choose to do my artificial on this topic is because it kind of fits with my over all project as well as sustainable design. In the article it talks about how we as designers are try to push for Zero Energy buildings but this rises so concern. The main questions are, Is this even possible? Even though we have energy convertible buildings, is it even close to almost making our buildings Zero Energy? These are all great questions but also very true.http://sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/core-page-files/ashrae_-_understanding_zero_energy_buildings.pdfanother example for LEEDThe first article is an example of rising public concern about the implementation of LEED certification. The article shares information on how several hundred municipalities have written LEED into their codes for regulatory or tax-credit purposes and the outcome, which is not all positive, for taxpayers.The second article is on architect, Frank Gehry’s view on LEED certification.http://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/2014/05/08/leed-certification-doesnt-add-value-and-costs-taxpayershttp://inhabitat.com/frank-gehry-calls-sustainable-design-political/

Introduction:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
What is the outcome of implementing LEED certification on taxpayers?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

In today’s world, environmental sustainability has become a crucial aspect for many individuals as they recognize the importance of preserving our natural resources for future generations. With regards to this, many organizations have come up with sustainable building guidelines, one of which is the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program. This program is gaining popularity across the globe as a certification for buildings with environmentally friendly features, but with the growth of its implementation, concerns have also risen.

Description:

LEED certification has become the most significant initiative for sustainable building design and construction, and many municipalities have made it a requirement for regulatory or tax credit purposes. However, some rising public concerns have come up regarding its implementation. One example is the rising cost of certification, which can be a burden to taxpayers. Moreover, architects also criticize the program, stating that it does not add significant value to a building and may not be worth the cost.

This paper will delve into the rising concerns regarding the implementation of the LEED program, exploring both the positive and negative impacts on sustainable building design and construction. The paper will start by analyzing the current situation regarding LEED certification and why it has become the most significant sustainability initiative. Then we will look at the rising concerns and criticisms regarding the program. We will examine the cost of implementation and the potential impacts of the certification on taxpayers. Finally, the paper will conclude by exploring the possible alternatives and solutions to address the concerns raised about the LEED program.

Objectives

1. To learn about the LEED program and rising concerns related to its implementation in the building industry.

2. To examine the advantages and disadvantages of the LEED certification program.

3. To explore the reasons for the rising public concern about the implementation of the LEED certification program.

4. To understand the impact of LEED certification on taxpayers, building owners, and the environment.

Learning Outcomes

After reading this material, learners will be able to:

1. Define the LEED certification program and understand its objectives and principles.

2. Critically examine the advantages and disadvantages of the LEED certification program and identify the challenges in its implementation.

3. Understand the reasons for the rising public concern about the implementation of the LEED certification program and analyze its impact on regulatory or tax-credit purposes.

4. Evaluate the impact of the LEED certification program on the environment, as well as building owners and taxpayers.

5. Recognize the concerns of designers and architects alike with respect to sustainable design and LEED certification.

6. Develop a more informed and critical perspective on the LEED certification program and its role in sustainable building design, policy and practice.

Solution 1:
LEED Certification – Rising Public Concerns

LEED certification is a widely recognized program that aims to promote sustainable and green architecture. However, despite its good intentions, there has been rising public concern about the implementation of this certification. Several hundred municipalities have written LEED into their codes for regulatory or tax-credit purposes. However, the outcomes are not always positive for investors or taxpayers.

Some taxpayers are critical of the additional costs associated with LEED certification, which can be exorbitant at times. Additionally, some have an issue with the lack of evidence that investing in a building with LEED-certification will actually have a tangible effect on the environment. There is also a lack of clarity about how the investment in the certification actually translates into energy savings and reduced emissions.

Given these concerns, there needs to be more transparency about the benefits of LEED certification, as well as a more detailed explanation about how these benefits can be achieved. One possible solution is to collaborate with industry associations and governmental agencies to establish a framework for measuring the benefits of LEED certification. This framework can then be used to provide transparency to taxpayers and investors about the actual savings in energy and reductions of emissions.

Solution 2:
Frank Gehry’s view on LEED Certification

Frank Gehry is one of the most notable architects in the world and a supporter of sustainable design. However, he’s also recently voiced concerns about LEED certification, calling the program “political” during a talk at the US Green Building Council’s Greenbuild conference. While Gehry recognizes the need for sustainable design, he’s not convinced that LEED certification is the right way to go about it.

Gehry’s concern is that LEED certification is more about checklist compliance than actually reducing the environmental footprint of buildings. He also states that the certification process can be very time-consuming and expensive, making it difficult for smaller firms to compete with larger, more established ones.

One possible solution is to re-examine the certification process to make it more adaptable to smaller architectural firms. There also needs to be a more nuanced approach to the checklist, placing greater emphasis on the actual environmental impact of the construction rather than just meeting the requirements of the certification. By introducing these changes and emphasizing their benefits, we can improve the sustainability of our buildings while also ensuring that smaller firms can compete in the market.

Suggested Resources/Books:
1. “Green Building: Principles and Practices in Residential Construction” by Abe Kruger and Carl Seville
2. “LEED Green Associate V4 Exam Practice Tests & Summary Sheets” by A. Togay Koralturk
3. “LEED AP Exam Guide: Study Materials, Sample Questions, Mock Exam, Building LEED Certification (LEED-NC) and Going Green” by Gang Chen

Rising Concerns about LEED program

Introduction:
LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a certification system designed to help building owners and operators to be more environmentally responsible and use resources efficiently. However, with the rise of the program, there are some rising concerns in the public. In this article, we will discuss some of the major rising concerns about the LEED program.

Rising Concerns:
1. High certification costs: One of the main criticisms of the LEED program is that it can be costly to obtain certification. Some argue that the high certification costs negatively impact small businesses and prevent them from participating in the program.

2. Lack of comprehensive standards: Another concern is that the program lacks comprehensive standards that account for all aspects of building performance. Critics argue that the program has a narrow focus and only considers a building’s design, rather than its actual performance after construction.

3. Limited focus on energy efficiency: Some argue that the LEED program places too much emphasis on energy efficiency and not enough on other environmental factors, such as water conservation.

4. Limited scope of impact: Some critics argue that the LEED program has a limited scope of impact. While the program has been successful in promoting sustainable building practices, it only applies to a small percentage of buildings and does not address larger-scale environmental issues.

5. Conflicting viewpoints among industry professionals: Finally, there are conflicting viewpoints among industry professionals about the effectiveness and significance of the LEED program. While some argue that it is an essential tool for promoting sustainable building practices, others believe that it is too expensive and does not address enough environmental factors.

Similar Asked Questions:

1. What are the main criticisms of the LEED program?
2. Does the LEED program adequately account for all aspects of building performance?
3. Is the LEED program too narrowly focused on energy efficiency?
4. Does the LEED program have a limited scope of impact?
5. Are industry professionals divided on the effectiveness of the LEED program?I need two page talks about the LEED program rising concernsthis is an example which aboutZero Energy BuildingsThe reason why I choose to do my artificial on this topic is because it kind of fits with my over all project as well as sustainable design. In the article it talks about how we as designers are try to push for Zero Energy buildings but this rises so concern. The main questions are, Is this even possible? Even though we have energy convertible buildings, is it even close to almost making our buildings Zero Energy? These are all great questions but also very true.http://sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/core-page-files/ashrae_-_understanding_zero_energy_buildings.pdfanother example for LEEDThe first article is an example of rising public concern about the implementation of LEED certification. The article shares information on how several hundred municipalities have written LEED into their codes for regulatory or tax-credit purposes and the outcome, which is not all positive, for taxpayers.The second article is on architect, Frank Gehry’s view on LEED certification.http://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/2014/05/08/leed-certification-doesnt-add-value-and-costs-taxpayershttp://inhabitat.com/frank-gehry-calls-sustainable-design-political/

Introduction:

In today’s world, environmental sustainability has become a crucial aspect for many individuals as they recognize the importance of preserving our natural resources for future generations. With regards to this, many organizations have come up with sustainable building guidelines, one of which is the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program. This program is gaining popularity across the globe as a certification for buildings with environmentally friendly features, but with the growth of its implementation, concerns have also risen.

Description:

LEED certification has become the most significant initiative for sustainable building design and construction, and many municipalities have made it a requirement for regulatory or tax credit purposes. However, some rising public concerns have come up regarding its implementation. One example is the rising cost of certification, which can be a burden to taxpayers. Moreover, architects also criticize the program, stating that it does not add significant value to a building and may not be worth the cost.

This paper will delve into the rising concerns regarding the implementation of the LEED program, exploring both the positive and negative impacts on sustainable building design and construction. The paper will start by analyzing the current situation regarding LEED certification and why it has become the most significant sustainability initiative. Then we will look at the rising concerns and criticisms regarding the program. We will examine the cost of implementation and the potential impacts of the certification on taxpayers. Finally, the paper will conclude by exploring the possible alternatives and solutions to address the concerns raised about the LEED program.

Objectives

1. To learn about the LEED program and rising concerns related to its implementation in the building industry.

2. To examine the advantages and disadvantages of the LEED certification program.

3. To explore the reasons for the rising public concern about the implementation of the LEED certification program.

4. To understand the impact of LEED certification on taxpayers, building owners, and the environment.

Learning Outcomes

After reading this material, learners will be able to:

1. Define the LEED certification program and understand its objectives and principles.

2. Critically examine the advantages and disadvantages of the LEED certification program and identify the challenges in its implementation.

3. Understand the reasons for the rising public concern about the implementation of the LEED certification program and analyze its impact on regulatory or tax-credit purposes.

4. Evaluate the impact of the LEED certification program on the environment, as well as building owners and taxpayers.

5. Recognize the concerns of designers and architects alike with respect to sustainable design and LEED certification.

6. Develop a more informed and critical perspective on the LEED certification program and its role in sustainable building design, policy and practice.

Solution 1:
LEED Certification – Rising Public Concerns

LEED certification is a widely recognized program that aims to promote sustainable and green architecture. However, despite its good intentions, there has been rising public concern about the implementation of this certification. Several hundred municipalities have written LEED into their codes for regulatory or tax-credit purposes. However, the outcomes are not always positive for investors or taxpayers.

Some taxpayers are critical of the additional costs associated with LEED certification, which can be exorbitant at times. Additionally, some have an issue with the lack of evidence that investing in a building with LEED-certification will actually have a tangible effect on the environment. There is also a lack of clarity about how the investment in the certification actually translates into energy savings and reduced emissions.

Given these concerns, there needs to be more transparency about the benefits of LEED certification, as well as a more detailed explanation about how these benefits can be achieved. One possible solution is to collaborate with industry associations and governmental agencies to establish a framework for measuring the benefits of LEED certification. This framework can then be used to provide transparency to taxpayers and investors about the actual savings in energy and reductions of emissions.

Solution 2:
Frank Gehry’s view on LEED Certification

Frank Gehry is one of the most notable architects in the world and a supporter of sustainable design. However, he’s also recently voiced concerns about LEED certification, calling the program “political” during a talk at the US Green Building Council’s Greenbuild conference. While Gehry recognizes the need for sustainable design, he’s not convinced that LEED certification is the right way to go about it.

Gehry’s concern is that LEED certification is more about checklist compliance than actually reducing the environmental footprint of buildings. He also states that the certification process can be very time-consuming and expensive, making it difficult for smaller firms to compete with larger, more established ones.

One possible solution is to re-examine the certification process to make it more adaptable to smaller architectural firms. There also needs to be a more nuanced approach to the checklist, placing greater emphasis on the actual environmental impact of the construction rather than just meeting the requirements of the certification. By introducing these changes and emphasizing their benefits, we can improve the sustainability of our buildings while also ensuring that smaller firms can compete in the market.

Suggested Resources/Books:
1. “Green Building: Principles and Practices in Residential Construction” by Abe Kruger and Carl Seville
2. “LEED Green Associate V4 Exam Practice Tests & Summary Sheets” by A. Togay Koralturk
3. “LEED AP Exam Guide: Study Materials, Sample Questions, Mock Exam, Building LEED Certification (LEED-NC) and Going Green” by Gang Chen

Rising Concerns about LEED program

Introduction:
LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a certification system designed to help building owners and operators to be more environmentally responsible and use resources efficiently. However, with the rise of the program, there are some rising concerns in the public. In this article, we will discuss some of the major rising concerns about the LEED program.

Rising Concerns:
1. High certification costs: One of the main criticisms of the LEED program is that it can be costly to obtain certification. Some argue that the high certification costs negatively impact small businesses and prevent them from participating in the program.

2. Lack of comprehensive standards: Another concern is that the program lacks comprehensive standards that account for all aspects of building performance. Critics argue that the program has a narrow focus and only considers a building’s design, rather than its actual performance after construction.

3. Limited focus on energy efficiency: Some argue that the LEED program places too much emphasis on energy efficiency and not enough on other environmental factors, such as water conservation.

4. Limited scope of impact: Some critics argue that the LEED program has a limited scope of impact. While the program has been successful in promoting sustainable building practices, it only applies to a small percentage of buildings and does not address larger-scale environmental issues.

5. Conflicting viewpoints among industry professionals: Finally, there are conflicting viewpoints among industry professionals about the effectiveness and significance of the LEED program. While some argue that it is an essential tool for promoting sustainable building practices, others believe that it is too expensive and does not address enough environmental factors.

Similar Asked Questions:

1. What are the main criticisms of the LEED program?
2. Does the LEED program adequately account for all aspects of building performance?
3. Is the LEED program too narrowly focused on energy efficiency?
4. Does the LEED program have a limited scope of impact?
5. Are industry professionals divided on the effectiveness of the LEED program?

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?