What is the justice model and how does it differ from other sentencing approaches?

  

Thejustice modelis a sentencing approach that usesdeterminate sentences, or fixed punishment terms; calls for the elimination of parole; and makes treatment voluntary. The justice model views crime reduction and successful incarceration as possible only if all offenders serve the same sentence for the same crime. This model posits that crime will continue or decrease to the extent that all offenders are treated the same.Address the following in a Word document of 35 pages:Identify the specific goals and challenges of the model.Use specific examples from case studies to support your critique.Do you feel that the model is an effective approach to the criminal justice system? Why or why not?Identify specific research findings to support your analysis.How viable is the model in managing costs and other current challenges facing correctional managers? Explain.Identify specific philosophical or social issues that could be used to support your conclusion.Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Introduction:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
What is the justice model and how does it differ from other sentencing approaches?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The Justice Model is a sentencing approach that aims to reduce crime and ensure successful incarceration. This model replaces indeterminate sentences with determinate sentences, eliminates parole, and makes treatment voluntary. It posits that all offenders should serve the same sentence for the same crime to reduce crime. However, the effectiveness of this model remains debatable. In this Word document, we will explore the goals and challenges of the Justice Model, evaluate its effectiveness in the criminal justice system, analyze research findings, and assess its viability in managing costs and current challenges facing correctional managers. Additionally, we will examine philosophical and social issues that can be used to support our conclusion.

Description:

Goals and Challenges of the Justice Model:

The Justice Model aims to enhance the accountability of offenders and promote a consistent criminal justice system. It opposes the use of rehabilitation programs as the main goal of incarceration. Instead, the focus is on punishment, public safety, and reducing crime by ensuring that all offenders serve the same sentence for the same crime. However, this model faces some challenges. The elimination of parole can lead to overcrowding in correctional facilities, making them more violent. Additionally, making treatment voluntary removes the incentive for offenders to participate in rehabilitative programs, resulting in a higher recidivism rate.

Effectiveness of the Justice Model in the Criminal Justice System:

The effectiveness of the Justice Model in the criminal justice system remains debatable. Some studies suggest that this model has reduced crime rates. However, others argue that the elimination of parole has contributed to rising correctional costs, overcrowding in prisons, and higher rates of recidivism. Although the Justice Model promotes consistency in the criminal justice system, it may also lead to disparate outcomes, especially for offenders from disadvantaged communities.

Research Findings:

Research has shown that the Justice Model has the potential to reduce crime rates. However, it has also revealed that the elimination of parole can lead to a higher recidivism rate and increased correctional costs. Additionally, the focus on punishment over rehabilitation can result in a lack of preparation for the reintegration of offenders into society.

Viability of the Justice Model in managing costs and current challenges facing correctional managers:

The Justice Model’s viability in managing costs and current challenges facing correctional managers remains debatable. This model increases the number of inmates in correctional facilities, leading to overcrowding and rising costs. However, it can also reduce the number of repeat offenders, which can save money in the long term. To determine its viability, we need to analyze its impact on rehabilitation, recidivism, and public safety.

Philosophical or Social Issues:

The Justice Model raises several philosophical and social issues, such as the purpose of incarceration, the role of rehabilitation, and the consequences of punishment. These issues require a deeper analysis of the principles that guide our criminal justice system and the values that we aim to uphold.

Conclusion:

The Justice Model presents both benefits and challenges in the criminal justice system. To determine its effectiveness, we need to analyze its impact on crime, public safety, rehabilitation, recidivism, and correctional costs. Additionally, we need to consider the philosophical and social issues that the Justice Model raises. By examining these factors, we can make an informed assessment of the Justice Model’s viability and its alignment with our values and principles.

Objectives:
1. To understand the concept of the justice model in the criminal justice system.
2. To identify the goals and challenges of the justice model.
3. To critically evaluate the effectiveness of the justice model in reducing crime and successful incarceration.
4. To analyze specific research findings supporting the effectiveness of the justice model.
5. To discuss the viability of the justice model in managing costs and other challenges faced by correctional managers.
6. To identify philosophical and social issues that can support or oppose the justice model.
7. To apply APA referencing style in the document.

Learning Outcomes:
1. Define the justice model in the criminal justice system and explain its key features.
2. Understand the goals and challenges associated with the implementation of the justice model.
3. Analyze case studies to support a critical evaluation of the effectiveness of the justice model in reducing crime and successful incarceration.
4. Critique the justice model and provide arguments on whether it is an effective approach to the criminal justice system or not.
5. Discuss specific research findings that support the effectiveness of the justice model and use them to enhance the evaluation of the model.
6. Evaluate the viability of the justice model in managing costs and other challenges faced by correctional managers.
7. Identify philosophical and social issues that either support or oppose the justice model and make a case for or against the model.
8. Apply APA referencing style in the document.

Headings:
1. Introduction
2. The Justice Model: Goals and Challenges
3. Case Studies Supporting Critique of the Justice Model
4. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Justice Model
5. Research Findings Supporting the Justice Model
6. Viability of the Justice Model in Managing Costs and Challenges
7. Philosophical and Social Issues Supporting or Opposing the Justice Model
8. Conclusion
9. References

Solution 1: The Justice Model – A Critical Evaluation

The Justice Model is a sentencing approach that aims to reduce crime by providing fixed punishment terms for offenders. However, this model has a few goals and challenges that need to be addressed for its effectiveness. In this solution, we will identify the specific goals and challenges of the Justice Model and provide case studies to support our critique.

The goals of the Justice Model are to provide equal and fair justice to all offenders, to eliminate parole, and to make treatment voluntary. Eliminating parole means that offenders serve their entire sentence, which is supposed to deter crime. However, the Justice Model assumes that all offenders are the same, and hence, they should get the same sentence for the same crime. This is a significant challenge as it does not consider the unique circumstances of offenders and their needs. For example, a young offender who committed a non-violent offense should not receive the same sentence as a repeat offender who committed a violent crime.

Case studies support our critique of the Justice Model. For example, in the USA, the implementation of determinate sentencing (Justice Model) in the 1980s resulted in an increase in the prison population to over two million. The majority of whom were non-violent drug offenders, resulting in disproportionate sentencing and racial bias. Additionally, the model hasn’t considered the possibility that people could change or rehabilitation.

In conclusion, the Justice Model’s implementation may seem practical, but it has significant challenges and does not consider unique circumstances, leading to a disproportionate sentencing. Therefore, I do not find the model effective in the criminal justice system.

Solution 2: The Viability of the Justice Model in managing costs and correctional challenges

The challenges facing correctional managers are continuously growing, including budget cuts, staff shortages, and gang violence. The Justice Model is a sentencing approach that aims to reduce crime by providing fixed punishment terms for all offenders. But how viable is the Justice Model in managing costs and other challenges facing correctional managers? In this solution, we will identify specific research findings that support our analysis.

The Justice Model’s focus is on reducing crime by providing fixed punishment terms to all offenders, resulting in fewer parole hearings and fewer costs. However, the model assumes that offenders will behave similarly regardless of their previous activities, which is not always the case. Additionally, offenders may have different needs, such as mental health or substance abuse treatment, and they may require more resources than others.

Research findings support our analysis that the Justice Model may not be cost-effective in managing correctional costs. For example, a recent study found the Justice Model led to a more extended prison term for first-time offenders. This prolonged sentencing, combined with the elimination of parole, results in increased costs as more prisoners will need to be housed and fed for more extended periods.

In conclusion, although the Justice Model may seem to be a viable option to manage correctional costs, its fixed-punishment approach and elimination of parole lead to increased costs because more prisoners are incarcerated for longer periods. Policy makers and correctional managers should consider proportionate sentencing, alternatives to incarceration, and rehabilitation programs that consider individual needs. This would be a more cost-effective approach to reduce recidivism and manage correctional costs.

Suggested Resources/Books:

1. “Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice” by Cyndi Banks – This book provides an in-depth exploration of ethical issues in the criminal justice system, including the justice model approach.

2. “The American Jail: Cornerstone of Modern Corrections” by Gary F. Cornelius – This book offers an overview of the challenges and management issues faced by correctional managers, including those related to cost containment.

3. “Contemporary Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honor of Gilbert Geis” edited by Henry N. Pontell and David Shichor – This collection of essays provides a critical analysis of current issues in the criminal justice system, including sentencing models.

4. “The Future of Punishment” edited by Thomas A. Nadelhoffer – This book offers a collection of essays on the use of punishment in the criminal justice system, including the justice model approach.

5. “The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections” edited by Kevin R. Reitz and Paula M. Ditton – This comprehensive handbook provides an overview of sentencing and corrections policies and practices, including the justice model approach.

Similar Asked Questions:

1. How does the justice model approach differ from traditional models of criminal sentencing and rehabilitation?

2. What are the theoretical underpinnings of the justice model approach, and how have they evolved over time?

3. How effective has the justice model approach been in achieving its stated goals of reducing crime and improving incarceration outcomes?

4. What are some of the challenges faced by correctional managers in implementing the justice model approach, and how can they be addressed?

5. What are some of the broader philosophical and social issues surrounding the justice model approach, and how do they impact its viability as a correctional policy?

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?