What are the similarities and differences between experimental and quasi-experimental designs according to Chapter 5 in the course text?

  

After reading Chapter 5 in the course text compare and contrast the similarities and differences between experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Describe the different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated. Demonstrate application of the scientific method and ethical principles by explaining what dictates the selection of design (experimental versus quasi-experimental) and the type of manipulation used in a research study. Finally, give an example of a situation that could be studied with an experiment or quasi-experiment and assess the appropriateness of one design over the other in light of practical and ethical concerns.Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. Utilize a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last 10 years and are documented in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Due by Thursday, July 7.

Introduction:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
What are the similarities and differences between experimental and quasi-experimental designs according to Chapter 5 in the course text?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs are two research methodologies that are commonly used in scientific investigations. Chapter 5 of the course text delves deep into the similarities and differences between these two types of designs, presenting their distinct attributes and highlighting their practical implementation based on contextual concerns. An important aspect that governs the selection of these methodologies is the nature of independent variable manipulation, which can vary depending on the research question. In this context, the scientific method and ethical principles play a crucial role in determining which design is most appropriate for a given study. This paper explores the different nuances of experimental and quasi-experimental designs, assesses the different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated, and presents a real-world example to illustrate the practical and ethical concerns around the selection of designs.

Description:

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs are both utilized to establish cause-and-effect relationships between independent and dependent variables in social science and medical research. Generally, an experimental design involves the manipulation of an independent variable, followed by the measurement of a dependent variable. In contrast, a quasi-experimental design is a type of observational study where the independent variable cannot be manipulated due to ethical, logistical, or practical reasons. Instead, the researcher utilizes distinct groups that can then be compared based on the variable of interest.

The independent variable can be manipulated in several ways, such as through natural manipulations like age or gender or through controlled manipulations such as providing different treatments to the participants. There are three primary types of manipulation: direct, staged, or confederate. Direct manipulation involves physically administering the treatment directly to participants, while staged manipulation occurs when a designed scenario is created for participants to react to. Finally, confederate manipulation involves utilizing other participants in the study to interact with the participants being examined.

The selection of the best design, experimental or quasi-experimental, is dependent on several practical and ethical concerns, such as the availability of a treatment or control group, the ethical implications of withholding treatment, and the practical implementation of the study. Ultimately, the selection of a design should provide the best ethical guidelines to ensure the protection of all participants while upholding the scientific standards of the study.

Example:

Consider a research study examining the effects of meditation on stress levels among cancer patients. This study can be conducted through an experimental or quasi-experimental design. An experimental approach would involve manipulating the independent variable by having some patients meditate twice daily, while the remaining group revels in usual care. The researcher observes the change in their stress levels before and after meditating and compares it between the two groups. Alternatively, conducting a quasi-experimental design investigation would mean identifying two distinct groups of patients, one that naturally practices meditation and the other that does not. The researcher measures the stress levels between these groups. The appropriateness of using one design over another in this case could depend on the ethical and practical concerns surrounding the study. For instance, if the study discovered that meditation was an effective solution to reduce cancer patients’ stress, it may be considered unethical to withhold the treatment from any group, and thus, an experimental design would be preferred.

Objectives:

– To compare and contrast experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
– To describe the different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated.
– To apply the scientific method and ethical principles in explaining the selection of design and manipulation used in a research study.
– To give an example of a situation that could be studied with an experiment or quasi-experiment.
– To assess the appropriateness of one design over the other in light of practical and ethical concerns.

Learning Outcomes:

By the end of the task, students will be able to:

– Distinguish between experimental and quasi-experimental designs and outline their similarities and differences.
– Demonstrate understanding of the various techniques used in manipulating independent variables.
– Analyze the criteria for choosing between experimental and quasi-experimental designs and justify the type of manipulation used in a research study.
– Apply the scientific method and ethical principles to identify the advantages and limitations of experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
– Create an example of a research study and assess the fit of experimental or quasi-experimental designs by taking into account practical and ethical considerations.

Heading 1: Comparison between Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs

Objective: To compare and contrast experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

Learning Outcomes:

– Distinguish between experimental and quasi-experimental designs and outline their similarities and differences.

Heading 2: Manipulation of Independent Variables

Objective: To describe the different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated.

Learning Outcomes:

– Demonstrate understanding of the various techniques used in manipulating independent variables.

Heading 3: Scientific Method and Ethical Principles in Research

Objective: To apply the scientific method and ethical principles in explaining the selection of design and manipulation used in a research study.

Learning Outcomes:

– Analyze the criteria for choosing between experimental and quasi-experimental designs and justify the type of manipulation used in a research study.
– Apply the scientific method and ethical principles to identify the advantages and limitations of experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

Heading 4: Example of Research Study and Design Choice

Objective: To give an example of a situation that could be studied with an experiment or quasi-experiment. To assess the appropriateness of one design over the other in light of practical and ethical concerns.

Learning Outcomes:

– Create an example of a research study and assess the fit of experimental or quasi-experimental designs by taking into account practical and ethical considerations.

Solution 1:

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs are two popular research methodologies in social sciences. Experimental designs are characterized by manipulating the independent variable and observing its effects on the dependent variable. Quasi-experimental designs, on the other hand, do not manipulate the independent variable; instead, they rely on preexisting group differences to make inferences about causality. While the two designs share some similarities, they also exhibit some differences. For instance, experimental designs tend to have greater internal validity, while quasi-experimental designs tend to have greater external validity.

There are several ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated in a research study. The most common way is to use a treatment and a control group. The treatment group receives the independent variable (e.g., a new drug), while the control group does not (e.g., a placebo). Another way is to use multiple independent variables and manipulate them simultaneously (e.g., time of day and temperature). Still, another way is to use within-subjects designs, where participants are exposed to all levels of the independent variable (e.g., testing the effects of various intensities of light exposure on cognitive performance).

The selection of experimental versus quasi-experimental design and the type of manipulation used is dictated by several factors, including the research question, the feasibility of manipulating the independent variable, participant selection, and ethical considerations. For instance, in situations where the independent variable cannot be easily manipulated (e.g., gender), quasi-experimental designs may be appropriate. Furthermore, the ethical considerations of manipulating certain independent variables may limit the choice of experimental design.

An example of a situation that could be studied with an experiment or quasi-experiment is the effects of a new anti-anxiety medication on cognitive function. An experimental design would involve randomly assigning participants to either a treatment or control group and providing the treatment group with the medication, while the control group would receive a placebo. A quasi-experimental design would involve comparing the cognitive function of individuals who have taken the medication (treatment group) to those who have not (control group) in a non-randomized design. In this case, the experimental design may be more appropriate due to its greater internal validity, whereas the quasi-experimental design may be more practical and ethical.

Solution 2:

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs are two research methodologies used in social sciences to investigate causal relationships. While the two share some similarities, they differ in the way they manipulate the independent variable. Experimental designs involve manipulating the independent variable, while quasi-experimental designs do not manipulate the variable. One similarity between the two is that both seek to establish causality between the independent and dependent variables.

The manipulation of independent variables can take several forms in research studies. One way is to use manipulation checks where researchers ensure that the manipulation has occurred as anticipated. Another way is to use multiple manipulations, where several independent variables are manipulated simultaneously. Additionally, researchers may manipulate the frequency, duration, or intensity of a variable to measure its effects on dependent variables.

The decision to use experimental or quasi-experimental design is based on the study’s research question, the ability to manipulate the independent variable, participant selection, and ethical considerations. Quasi-experimental designs may be more appropriate in situations where it is not ethical or feasible to randomly assign participants to a control or treatment group. Furthermore, the design used should reflect the research goals and be practical for the researcher to undertake.

An example of a situation that could be studied using an experimental or quasi-experimental design is the effects of mindfulness meditation on stress levels. In an experimental design, participants would be randomly assigned to either a treatment (mindfulness meditation group) or control (no meditation group) group. The researcher would then collect stress level data at baseline and after the intervention to determine the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in reducing stress levels. A quasi-experimental design could involve comparing the stress levels of individuals who have practiced mindfulness meditation regularly with those who have not. The appropriateness of the design used would depend on practical and ethical considerations. The experimental design may be more ethical in terms of participant selection, and practical in terms of control of extraneous variables, whereas the quasi-experimental design may be more practical in terms of participant availability and ethical considerations.

Suggested Resources/Books:

1. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference by Donald T. Campbell and Julian C. Stanley.
2. Introduction to Experimental Designs by Keppel, Geoffrey, and Thomas D. Wickens.

Similar Asked Questions:

1. What are the similarities and differences between experimental and quasi-experimental designs?
2. What are the different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated?
3. What ethical principles and scientific method are used while selecting the design for a research study?
4. Can you give an example of a study that can be conducted using an experiment or quasi-experiment?
5. What are the practical and ethical concerns to consider while selecting an appropriate design for a study?

Comparison of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs:

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental designs are two research methodologies used by researchers in empirical studies. Experimental design involves the manipulation of an independent variable, which is observed for its effect on a dependent variable, while quasi-experimental design does not involve random assignment of participants to experimental and control conditions. Both designs have their unique advantages and limitations, which make them suitable for varying conditions and objectives.

Different ways of Independent Variable Manipulation:

There are different ways in which an independent variable can be manipulated, including direct manipulation, physiological manipulation, instructional manipulation, environmental manipulation, and stimulation manipulation among others. The selection of the manipulation method is dependent on the research question and objective.

Scientific Method and Ethical Principles:

The scientific method involves a series of steps from research questions to data analysis and interpretation to ensure validity, reliability, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Ethical principles are crucial in research, guiding researchers to conduct studies with integrity, respect for human dignity, ethical considerations to participants, and safeguarding the participants’ welfare.

Example of a Study with Appropriate Design Selection:

A study assessing the effectiveness of a nutrition program for reducing obesity in children can utilize a quasi-experimental design with a non-randomized control group. The study’s ethical considerations require informed consent, protection of the participants’ privacy and confidentiality, and ensuring that the program does not cause harm to participants.

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?