What are the differences in the requirements process between the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework?

  

Hi i need 0 % plagarism and great work. I need at least 250 to 300 words document. Compare and contrast how the requirements process and how requirements are documented differ between the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework. How are changes to requirements handled within each?0% plagarism

Introduction:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
What are the differences in the requirements process between the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The software development process is an essential part of any company’s strategic plan, and the software development approach is a critical component of that process. Two significant software development approaches are the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework. These two approaches differ significantly in the requirements process and requirements documentation. This paper aims to compare and contrast how the requirements process and how requirements are documented differ in the two approaches. Additionally, it will explore how changes to requirements handled within each process.

Description:

The traditional plan-driven software development approach is a sequential or linear process wherein each phase of the process must be completed before the next phase starts. The phases involved in this approach include requirements gathering, analysis, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. The requirements process in this software development approach typically involves the customers or stakeholders defining their needs and requirements for the software product in-depth. Based on these requirements, the development team creates a comprehensive and detailed software requirements specification (SRS) document. The SRS document contains detailed information regarding the software’s functions, features, user interfaces, hardware, and software environments and so on. All these requirements are documented upfront and are fixed throughout the software development process.

On the other hand, the SCRUM framework is an iterative and incremental software development approach. The requirements process in this software development approach is iterative and highly flexible. The stakeholders can make changes to the requirements at any time during the development process. This flexibility allows the stakeholders to adapt to changes in the market or other external factors. The SCRUM approach achieves this through the use of backlogs. Backlogs are lists of items that need to be implemented in the software product. They contain user stories, which are high-level descriptions of what the software product should do. These user stories are prioritized, and the development team works on the highest-priority items first.

Changes to requirements are handled differently in both approaches. In the traditional plan-driven software development approach, changes to requirements are only allowed through a formal change request process. The change request process involves assessing the impact of the change request on the project’s budget, schedule, and overall project plan. The stakeholders must approve the change request before the changes can be implemented. Conversely, changes to requirements in the SCRUM approach are informal and fluid. The development team, product owner, and stakeholders can discuss changes during daily or weekly stand-up meetings.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, both the traditional plan-driven and SCRUM software development approaches have different requirements processes and documentation methods. The traditional plan-driven software development approach is more formal, with a comprehensive and detailed software requirements specification document upfront. On the other hand, the SCRUM approach is highly flexible and allows for changes to requirements at any time during the development process. It achieves this through the use of backlogs. Changes to requirements are managed through an informal process in the SCRUM approach, while in the traditional plan-driven approach, all changes must go through a formal change request process.

Objectives:

– To understand the requirements process in traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework.
– To compare and contrast the differences between how requirements are documented in traditional plan-driven software development approach and the SCRUM framework.
– To understand how changes to requirements are handled in both traditional plan-driven software development approach and the SCRUM framework.

Learning Outcomes:

Upon completion of this module, learners will be able to:

– Describe the requirements process in both traditional plan-driven software development approach and the SCRUM framework
– Contrast the differences in how requirements are documented between traditional plan-driven software development approach and the SCRUM framework
– Explain how changes to requirements are handled in traditional plan-driven software development approach
– Explain how changes to requirements are handled in the SCRUM framework

Requirements Process and Documentation in Plan-Driven vs SCRUM Framework:

Traditional plan-driven software development approach follows a sequential process where requirements are gathered, analyzed, documented, and signed off by stakeholders before proceeding to the next phase of development. In the traditional approach, changes to requirements are not easy to accommodate as they require a change request process, which can be time-consuming and costly.

On the other hand, SCRUM framework takes an iterative and incremental approach where requirements are captured as the product evolves. In SCRUM, requirements are documented in a product backlog that is prioritized by the product owner. Changes to requirements are handled through an iterative process where the product owner can re-prioritize the backlog as new requirements or changes emerge.

Handling Changes to Requirements:

In traditional plan-driven software development approach, changes to requirements are handled through a change request process. These change requests are evaluated, approved or rejected based on their impact on the budget, timeline, and quality of the project. If approved, the changes are incorporated into the project scope, and a new plan is created. However, changes to requirements in traditional plan-driven software development approach can be costly and delay the project schedule.

In the SCRUM framework, changes to requirements are handled through the product backlog. The product owner can add, remove or change requirements as needed, and reprioritize the backlog. The team then works on the high-priority backlog items in the next sprint, which typically lasts 2-4 weeks. Since SCRUM is an iterative process, changes to requirements are expected and can be accommodated in the next sprint without affecting the overall project timeline.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the requirements process and how requirements are documented differ significantly between the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework. The traditional approach follows a sequential process, while SCRUM follows an iterative and incremental approach. Changes to requirements in traditional plan-driven software development approach can be costly and delay the project schedule, but in the SCRUM framework, changes can be accommodated without affecting the overall project timeline. Understanding these differences can help organizations in deciding which approach is best suited for their software development projects.

Solution 1: Requirements Process and Documentation in Traditional Plan-Driven Software Development

In the traditional plan-driven software development approach, the requirements process is typically formal and thorough. A business analyst gathers requirements from stakeholders, creates detailed documentation, and sends it to the development team for review and sign-off. This documentation is often comprehensive and detailed, outlining all the functional and non-functional requirements for the software, as well as any constraints or assumptions.

Once the requirements documentation is approved, the development team begins work on the software project. Changes to the requirements are typically discouraged, and any changes that are made usually require a formal change request process. This leads to a somewhat rigid approach to software development, with the emphasis on getting requirements right the first time to avoid change requests.

Solution 2: Requirements Process and Documentation in the SCRUM Framework

In the SCRUM framework, the requirements process is more iterative and flexible compared to the traditional approach. The process begins with a product owner who creates and prioritizes a backlog of features and requirements, which the development team uses as a basis for determining what can be delivered in each sprint.

The requirements documentation in SCRUM is typically much lighter and focused on high-level user stories, rather than detailed documentation. This provides room for flexibility and agility, with the development team able to adapt to changes more easily. The development cycle typically includes frequent reviews and feedback sessions, allowing for changes to be made even during development.

Changes to the requirements within SCRUM are handled in a more collaborative manner compared to the traditional approach. The product owner can add, modify, or remove requirements at any point, with the team working together with the product owner to decide how to handle these changes. This approach allows for constant improvement and adaptation throughout the development process.

In conclusion, both the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the SCRUM framework have different requirements processes and documentation methods. While the traditional approach is more formal and rigid, the SCRUM framework is more flexible and collaborative. Changes to requirements are handled differently in each approach, with the traditional approach requiring a formal change request process, while SCRUM allows for changes to be made in a more flexible and adaptive manner.

Suggested Resources/Books:

1. Agile Estimating and Planning by Mike Cohn
2. Software Requirements, 3rd Edition by Karl Wiegers and Joy Beatty
3. Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time by Jeff Sutherland
4. Requirements-Led Project Management: Discovering David’s Slingshot by Suzanne Robertson and James Robertson
5. User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development by Mike Cohn

Comparing the Requirements Process and Documentation in Waterfall and SCRUM

Waterfall and SCRUM are two of the most popular software development methodologies utilized by many organizations. While they have different approaches to everything, from planning to deployment, they differ greatly in how they handle requirements analysis, gathering, and documentation.

In traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development, requirements are typically gathered and documented at the beginning of the project. This process usually involves detailed documentation via use cases, functional specifications, and other documentation forms. The requirement phase is typically carried out by business analysts, who then specify the software specifications for the software development team to begin work. This is known as a “big bang” approach.

In contrast, SCRUM is an agile methodology that emphasizes user stories that describe desired software functionality. Unlike the waterfall methodology, implementing changes to requirements in SCRUM is easier since requirements are kept less formalized. Instead of specifying the requirements in detail at the start of the project, the requirements are mainly encompassed in the user stories formulated by the product owner.

How Changes to Requirements are Handled in Each

In the waterfall approach, the requirements are ‘frozen,’ meaning that any changes made after the requirements phase should undergo rigorous change request processing. If a change request is granted, it will likely cause a delay in the project completion timeline. This is because the requirements phase is long and drawn out due to the fact that changes made at this stage could cause disruptions and major re-workings down the line.

Whereas in SCRUM, the Agile approach facilitates change management. SCRUM allows for more frequent and smaller changes, such as changing a story point or adding another user story to the backlog, without significant disruption to the entire project timeline. Changes can be achieved because the requirements are less formalized, and the process is highly iterative, developments are delivered in small and frequent increments.

Similar Asked Questions

1. What are the differences between the traditional plan-driven (waterfall) software development approach and the agile SCRUM framework?
2. How does SCRUM handle requirements gathering, analysis, and documentation, and how does it differ from the waterfall approach?
3. What is the process for managing changes to requirements in waterfall, and how does it differ from the agile approach?
4. Why is a frozen requirement approach better suited for waterfall, and why is a more flexible approach necessary in SCRUM?
5. What is the impact of changes to requirements on project timelines and budget in the waterfall and SCRUM approaches?

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?