What are some common organizational barriers to communication and who is responsible for removing them?


*What are some of the common organizational barriers to the communications process? Who is responsible for removing these barriers? Why so? *The ability to strike is the most powerful tool employees have. Why has this tool been stripped from law enforcement officers? If the ability to strike is not to be granted to law enforcement officers, how tools should officers have to resolve seemingly impassable differences?


Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
What are some common organizational barriers to communication and who is responsible for removing them?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Effective communication is fundamental in any organization and its success relies on the ability of those involved to exchange ideas, information, and knowledge. However, there are often barriers that can hinder the communication process, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts. Understanding these barriers and their causes is crucial in ensuring effective communication among all parties involved and achieving organizational goals.


Organizations often face several barriers that hinder effective communication. These barriers can be classified into internal and external barriers. Internal barriers include poor communication system, lack of trust among employees, a rigid organizational structure, and unclear policies. External barriers, on the other hand, include economic, social, cultural, and political factors.

Removing these barriers is the responsibility of every member of the organization, from the top-level management to the front-line employees. The management has a role in creating an open and transparent communication system that allows employees to voice their opinions without fear of retaliation. Employees, on the other hand, should take the initiative to communicate with their colleagues and management, express their concerns, and offer feedback.

The ability to strike is a powerful tool that employees can use to leverage their demands and grievances. However, this tool has been stripped from law enforcement officers due to the essential nature of their job. The use of force, if not well coordinated, could lead to disastrous consequences. Therefore, finding alternative ways to resolve disputes in a civilized and professional manner is crucial. Some of these tools include mediation, arbitration, and consensus-building.

In conclusion, effective communication is essential in any organization to achieve its goals. Understanding the barriers that hinder effective communication and the responsibility of every member of the organization in removing these barriers is critical. While the ability to strike is an effective tool for employees seeking to leverage their demands and grievances, it may not always be appropriate for law enforcement officers. Therefore, other alternative tools should be employed to resolve disputes in a civilized and professional way.

1. To identify common organizational barriers that can hinder the communication process within an organization
2. To understand the role and responsibility of those who are involved in removing communication barriers
3. To analyze the reasons why the striking tool has been stripped from law enforcement officers
4. To evaluate alternative tools available to law enforcement officers to resolve seemingly impassable differences

Learning Outcomes:

Identifying Common Organizational Barriers to Communication:
1. Participants will be able to recognize different types of communication barriers that can hinder effective communication in an organization.
2. Participants will be able to explain the impact of these barriers on organizational performance and build strategies to overcome them.

Understanding the Responsibility of Removing Communication Barriers:
1. Participants will be able to understand the roles and responsibilities of those who are involved in removing communication barriers within an organization.
2. Participants will be able to explain the importance of proactively addressing communication barriers to ensure smooth and efficient communication processes.

Analyzing the Reasons Why Law Enforcement Officers‘ Striking Power has been Stripped:
1. Participants will be able to explain the historical context that led to the stripping of law enforcement officers’ striking power.
2. Participants will be able to evaluate the pros and cons of granting law enforcement officers the ability to strike.

Evaluating Alternative Tools that Law Enforcement Officers can Use:
1. Participants will be able to identify alternative tools that law enforcement officers can use to resolve differences with their employers.
2. Participants will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of these tools and identify the factors that need to be considered before applying them.

1. Identifying Communication Barriers in an Organization
2. Roles and Responsibilities in Removing Communication Barriers
3. Striking Power of Law Enforcement Officers
4. Alternative Tools for Resolving Differences.

Solution 1: Overcoming Organizational Barriers to Effective Communication
Organizational barriers are one of the major impediments to effective communication processes within workplaces. Some of the common organizational barriers include lack of trust, unclear responsibilities, rigid hierarchies, unclear communication expectations, and ineffective communication channels. These barriers can be removed by implementing several strategies such as defining clear communication expectations, providing regular feedback, creating open communication channels, and promoting a culture of effective communication.

The responsibility of removing these barriers falls on the management and leaders within the organization. The management should focus on promoting a culture of open communication by fostering honesty, transparency, and trust among employees. Leaders should also take steps to ensure that communication channels are easily accessible and encourage cross-functional communication to eliminate silos and promote collaboration.

Solution 2: Alternative Tools for Law Enforcement Officers to Resolve Seemingly Impassable Differences
The ability to strike is a powerful tool that employees may use to bring attention to their grievances or to force their employer to make concessions. However, law enforcement officers are not granted the right to strike due to the vital nature of their work. The inability of law enforcement officers to strike indicates the need for alternative tools or mechanisms that officers can use to resolve seemingly impassable differences.

One option could be the establishment of independent mediation boards that will impartially resolve disputes between law enforcement officers and their employers. Officers can also be provided with more opportunities for collective bargaining to ensure that their interests are represented and protected. Additionally, regular employee evaluations and feedback mechanisms that are focused on conflict resolution can help identify potential problems early and help prevent them from escalating. These alternative tools can help law enforcement officers resolve their differences without compromising the essential services they provide to the community.

Suggested Resources/Books:

1. “Communication in Organizations: Basic Skills and Conversation Models” by Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz.
2. “Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes” by Katherine Miller and Joshua Barbour.
3. “Communication for Business and the Professions: Strategies and Skills” by Judith Dwyer.

Similar asked questions:

1. How can organizational culture impact the communication within a company?
2. What are some techniques for breaking down communication barriers between different departments in an organization?
3. What are the benefits of effective communication in the workplace?
4. How can management effectively communicate changes in policies or procedures to employees?
5. What role does technology play in improving communication within organizations?

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?