How many sources are required for APA citations and references?

  

Rubric Name: Rubric for PaperCriteriaGoodFairPoorNo submissionDocumentation and formatting10 pointsUses
at least three sources and provides appropriate APA citations and
references (on a References page); formats the citations and references
correctly6 pointsUses at least three sources and provides APA citations and references (on a References page); makes some mistakes in formatting2 pointsFails
to include three sources, or fails to include citations and/or
references, or fails to format the citations and references correctly0 pointsNo submissionSoftware research20 pointsEffectively
describes the purpose of the software so as to enable the upper
management of DRAC to understand the organizational need and to make the
decision to purchase
Supports the proposal with documentation and evidence14 pointsDescribes
the software, but not enough for upper management to understand the
organizational need and to make the decision to purchase
Does not sufficiently support the proposal with documentation and evidence7 pointsDescribes the software in a manner that is unclear to upper management
Does not sufficiently support the proposal with documentation and
evidenceupper management does not have enough information to make
appropriate decisions0 pointsNo submission or not includedSoftware analysis20 pointsProvides an analysis that demonstrates how the software will meet the organization’s needs14 pointsProvides
an analysis that demonstrates the purpose of the software, but that
does not demonstrate how the software will meet the organization’s needs7 pointsProvides
an analysis that fails to demonstrate the purpose of the software or
how it will meet the organization’s needs, or fails to provide an
analysis0 pointsNo submissionor not includedExecutive proposal50 pointsEffectively lists and describes the benefits of the software
Details and explains the primary and ancillary costs of the software
Includes all key points of the analysis and enables upper management
to understand organizational needs enough to make the right choice35 pointsLists and describes the benefits of the software
Leaves out or is vague regarding key information, such as on cost17 pointsDescribes the benefits of the software in a way that is unclear
Provides proposal that is difficult to follow and/or that leaves out key information and details0 pointsNo submissionor not includedOverall ScoreLevel 311 or moreLevel 27 or moreLevel 10 or morereport that includes, but not limited to, information describing: the
forensic methodologies used to collect the data from the various
devices, the techniques used to analyze the acquired data and any
pertinent case-related information that was discovered during the
analysis.

Introduction:
This rubric is designed to assess the quality of a paper written by an IT professional tasked with researching and proposing software to their organization. The paper should include documentation and formatting elements, details on the purpose and analysis of the software, and an executive proposal that outlines the benefits and costs of implementing the software.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
How many sources are required for APA citations and references?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Description:
The rubric is divided into four categories: documentation and formatting, software research, software analysis, and executive proposal. In the documentation and formatting category, the paper should use at least three sources and provide proper APA citations and references. The software research section should effectively describe the purpose of the software, provide documentation and evidence to support the proposal, and enable upper management to make a purchase decision. In the software analysis section, the writer should demonstrate how the software will meet the organization’s needs. Finally, the executive proposal should list and describe the benefits of the software, as well as detail the primary and ancillary costs and enable upper management to make an informed decision. The paper must include information on the forensic methodologies used to collect the data, techniques used to analyze the data, and any pertinent case-related information discovered during the analysis. The rubric has three levels – good, fair, and poor – and the overall score will vary based on the level achieved in each category.

Objectives:
– To write a professional paper that follows APA guidelines
– To effectively describe software that meets organizational needs
– To provide an analysis that demonstrates how the software meets the organization’s needs
– To list and describe the benefits of the software and the costs associated with it
– To create an executive proposal that includes all key points and information necessary for upper management to make an informed decision

Learning Outcomes:
After completing this project, students will be able to:
– Use at least three sources to support their writing and appropriately cite them using APA formatting
– Describe software in a way that upper management can understand the organizational need and make a decision to purchase it
– Analyze software to show how it meets an organization’s needs
– Articulate the benefits and costs associated with the software
– Write an executive proposal that includes essential details and information for informed decision-making

Solution 1:

Rubric for Paper
Criteria

Good

Fair

Poor

No submission

Documentation and formatting

10 points

Uses at least three sources and provides appropriate APA citations and references (on a References page); formats the citations and references correctly

6 points

Uses at least three sources and provides APA citations and references (on a References page); makes some mistakes in formatting

2 points

Fails to include three sources, or fails to include citations and/or references, or fails to format the citations and references correctly

0 points

No submission

Software research

20 points

Effectively describes the purpose of the software so as to enable the upper management of DRAC to understand the organizational need and to make the decision to purchase Supports the proposal with documentation and evidence

14 points

Describes the software, but not enough for upper management to understand the organizational need and to make the decision to purchase Does not sufficiently support the proposal with documentation and evidence

7 points

Describes the software in a manner that is unclear to upper management Does not sufficiently support the proposal with documentation and evidenceupper management does not have enough information to make appropriate decisions

0 points

No submission or not included

Software analysis

20 points

Provides an analysis that demonstrates how the software will meet the organization’s needs

14 points

Provides an analysis that demonstrates the purpose of the software, but that does not demonstrate how the software will meet the organization’s needs

7 points

Provides an analysis that fails to demonstrate the purpose of the software or how it will meet the organization’s needs, or fails to provide an analysis

0 points

No submission or not included

Executive proposal

50 points

Effectively lists and describes the benefits of the software Details and explains the primary and ancillary costs of the software Includes all key points of the analysis and enables upper management to understand organizational needs enough to make the right choice

35 points

Lists and describes the benefits of the software Leaves out or is vague regarding key information, such as on cost

17 points

Describes the benefits of the software in a way that is unclear Provides proposal that is difficult to follow and/or that leaves out key information and details

0 points

No submission or not included

Overall Score

Level 3

11 or more

Level 2

7 or more

Level 1

0 or more

Solution 2:

Rubric for Paper
Criteria

Good

Fair

Poor

No submission

Documentation and formatting

10 points

Uses appropriate APA citations and references (on a References page) and formats the citations and references correctly

6 points

Uses APA citations and references (on a References page), but makes some mistakes in formatting

2 points

Fails to include APA citations, references, or fails to format the citations and references correctly

0 points

No submission

Software research

20 points

Effectively explains the purpose of the software to upper management of DRAC to enable them to understand the organizational need and make an informed decision about the purchase. Supports the proposal with evidence and documentation.

14 points

Describes the software, but not enough to enable upper management to understand the organizational need and make an informed decision. Provides insufficient support with evidence and documentation.

7 points

Describes the software in a manner that is unclear and does not provide enough information for upper management to make appropriate decisions. Fails to provide enough support with evidence and documentation.

0 points

No submission or not included

Software analysis

20 points

Provides a clear analysis demonstrating how the software will meet the needs of the organization.

14 points

Provides an analysis demonstrating the purpose of the software, but not how it will meet the needs of the organization.

7 points

Provides an analysis that fails to demonstrate the purpose of the software or how it will meet the needs of the organization. Fails to provide a clear analysis.

0 points

No submission or not included

Executive proposal

50 points

Effectively lists and describes the benefits of the software. Details and explains the primary and ancillary costs of the software. Includes all key points of the analysis enabling upper management to understand the organizational needs to make an informed decision.

35 points

Lists and describes the benefits of the software but leaves out or lacks detail on key information such as cost. Does not include all key points of the analysis. Some information is unclear.

17 points

Describes the benefits of the software in a way that is difficult to follow and/or leaves out key information and details, including cost. Fails to include all key information and details. Proposal is difficult to understand.

0 points

No submission or not included

Overall Score

Level 3

11 or more

Level 2

7 or more

Level 1

0 or more

Suggested Resources/Books:
1. “Digital Forensics with Open Source Tools” by Cory Altheide and Harlan Carvey
2. “Computer Forensics JumpStart” by Michael G. Solomon and K. Rudolph
3. “File System Forensic Analysis” by Brian Carrier
4. “Windows Forensic Analysis Toolkit, Fourth Edition: Advanced Analysis Techniques for Windows 8” by Harlan Carvey
5. “Investigating Windows Systems” by Harlan Carvey

Similar Asked Questions:
1. What are the most effective forensic methodologies used to collect data from various devices?
2. What are the advanced techniques used for analyzing acquired data from various devices during digital forensics?
3. How important is case-related information when performing digital forensics analysis?
4. How to ensure the integrity and authenticity of digital evidence during forensic analysis?
5. What are the major challenges faced during digital forensics investigation, and how to overcome them?

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?