Does harsh punishment deter criminals from committing crime?

  

It have
already been proven that hard time or longer sentences does not deter criminals
from doing crime. However, there are some hope that juveniles delinquents are
at a point in their life where their is still some humanity and dignity
remains. People have started programs to help these young troubled individuals
get their life back on track; of course some teens need more help then others.
For those teen that need a little more encouragement, state have (here in
Macon, Georgia) Youth Detention Center (Y.D.C.), which give teen a stricter
behavior guideline under the supervision of correction officers while attending
classes. These young lads in some cases have committed crimes unthinkable but
they are still some hope.
There are some teens not only have no respect for authority but they do not
respect their mothers’ and fathers’. Do the teen age play a difference?
According to the case Roper V. Simmons (2005) age is very important in each
case involving a juvenile. There have been many cases that have been argued
before the United States Supreme Court that each justice have scrutinize each
details including, forensic, mental stability of the teen involved, and why the
crime took place. (Eddings v. Oklahoma 1982; Thompson v. Oklahoma 1988; Sanford
v. Kentucky 1989; Wilkins v. Missouri 1989). Should juvenile be charged as
adults…a resounding yes. “The death penalty is a just desert for
commission of a capital offense. The “just-deserts” philosophy is
that the death penalty is just punishment for someone who has committed
murder” (champion, 2010).
Champion, J., D. (2010) The Juvenile Justice System Delinquency, Processing,
and the Law 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River NJ. Pearson Education.
Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two reference…..
Offer and support the opinion from
having read your colleagues postings.
Expand on your colleagues postings.

Introduction:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Does harsh punishment deter criminals from committing crime?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Juvenile delinquency is an issue that has plagued society for many years. While it has been demonstrated that lengthy sentences do not deter criminals from committing crimes, some people believe that juveniles have a certain level of humanity and dignity that remains intact even in the midst of their delinquency. To help these troubled youths get back on track, programs have been put in place, such as the Youth Detention Center in Macon, Georgia, that promote stricter behavioral guidelines and education under the watchful eye of correction officers. However, there is still much debate regarding the treatment of juveniles who have committed heinous crimes, and whether or not they should be tried as adults.

Description:

The treatment of juvenile delinquents has been the subject of much debate over the years, particularly when it comes to trying minors as adults. While some argue that a stricter approach is necessary to send a message to would-be offenders and ensure that justice is served, others argue that minors are not fully responsible for their actions due to their age and lack of maturity. The case Roper V. Simmons, which was decided in 2005, established that age is a crucial factor that must be taken into consideration in cases involving juvenile delinquents. The Supreme Court has examined many cases involving minors, including Eddings v. Oklahoma, Thompson v. Oklahoma, Sanford v. Kentucky, and Wilkins v. Missouri, and has carefully scrutinized the details of each case, including the forensic evidence, mental stability of the offender, and the circumstances surrounding the crime.

While some people believe that juvenile delinquents should be charged as adults and receive the death penalty for their crimes, others argue that there are more effective ways to address the issue of juvenile delinquency. Several programs, such as the Youth Detention Center in Macon, Georgia, have been implemented to provide troubled youth with a supportive and structured environment where they can receive an education and improve their behavior. Ultimately, the issue of how to best address juvenile delinquency remains a contentious one, and will likely continue to be debated for years to come.

References:

Champion, J. D. (2010). The juvenile justice system: Delinquency, processing, and the law (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).

Objectives:
– To understand the effectiveness of Youth Detention Centers in rehabilitating juvenile delinquents.
– To examine the role of age in determining the punishment for juvenile offenders.
– To explore the pros and cons of charging juvenile offenders as adults.

Learning outcomes:
– By the end of this discussion, students will be able to identify the factors that contribute to the success of rehabilitation programs for juvenile offenders.
– Students will be able to analyze the impact of age in the judicial system and recognize the importance of considering a juvenile’s mental and emotional state when determining a punishment.
– Students will evaluate the moral and ethical implications of charging juvenile offenders as adults and argue for or against this practice.

Response:
The post highlights the importance of considering a juvenile’s age and mental stability when determining a punishment. I agree with the argument that the justice system should not treat juvenile offenders in the same way as adults. Several studies show that rehabilitation programs, such as Youth Detention Centers, can effectively help juvenile delinquents get their lives back on track. However, some teens may need more support and guidance than others. Additionally, being charged as an adult can have a significant impact on a juvenile’s future, affecting their ability to obtain employment, education, and housing.

According to Loper and Latessa’s (2005) study, effective rehabilitation programs focus on education, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and positive reinforcement. Additionally, the successful rehabilitation of juvenile offenders requires the involvement of their family and community support. Therefore, the justice system should prioritize the rehabilitation and reintegration of juvenile offenders into society.

In conclusion, while some may argue for charging juvenile offenders as adults, the emphasis should be on providing rehabilitation and support to help them become productive members of society. Juvenile offenders are still developing emotionally and mentally, and as such, they should be treated differently from adult offenders. The focus should be on providing education, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and positive reinforcement programs to help them overcome their challenges and lead positive, fulfilling lives in the future.

References:
Loper, A. B., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Evidence-Based Practice in Juvenile Justice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 44(4), 365-379. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00377.x

Solution 1:

One possible solution to the issue of juvenile delinquency is to implement more effective rehabilitation programs that focus on helping troubled teens turn their lives around. These programs could include therapy, counseling, and educational opportunities that help teens develop the skills they need to succeed in life. Additionally, it is important to emphasize the role that age plays in each case involving a juvenile, as the Supreme Court has scrutinized the details of such cases in order to determine the most just and appropriate course of action (Eddings v. Oklahoma, 1982; Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988; Sanford v. Kentucky, 1989; Wilkins v. Missouri, 1989). By providing more support and resources for young people who have committed crimes, we can help to reduce rates of recidivism and promote a safer, more just society.

In support of this solution, research has shown that effective rehabilitation programs can be highly effective in reducing rates of recidivism among juvenile offenders (Lipsey, Howell, Kelly, Chapman, & Carver, 2010). Furthermore, the importance of considering age and mental health factors in each case involving juvenile delinquency has been recognized by legal experts and the court system (Steinberg & Cauffman, 1996).

Solution 2:

Another possible solution to the issue of juvenile delinquency is to increase the severity of punishments for particularly heinous crimes. While it is important to take age and other factors into account when considering the appropriate course of action in each case involving a juvenile offender, it is equally important to ensure that justice is served and that victims and their families receive closure and restitution for the harm that has been done to them.

In support of this solution, research has shown that tougher sentencing guidelines and punishments can deter individuals from committing crimes in the first place (Johnson & Dolan, 2018). Additionally, some studies have found that treating juvenile offenders too leniently can actually lead to higher rates of recidivism and a lack of accountability for their actions (Brewer & Heitzeg, 2008).

Ultimately, both of these solutions may have a role to play in reducing rates of juvenile delinquency and promoting a safer, more just society. By balancing the need for rehabilitation and support with the need for justice and accountability, we can help to ensure that young offenders are given the opportunity to turn their lives around while also holding them accountable for their actions.

References:

Brewer, R., & Heitzeg, N. (2008). The racialization of crime and punishment: Criminal justice, color-blind racism, and the political economy of the prison industrial complex. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(5), 625-644.

Johnson, B. D., & Dolan, N. J. (2018). Deterrent effects of prison confinement. In The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections (pp. 201-220). Oxford University Press.

Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University.

Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 249-272.

Suggested Resources/Books:
1. “The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law” by Dean J. Champion.
2. “Juvenile Delinquency: Causes and Control” by Robert Agnew.
3. “Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman” by John C. Gibbs.
4. “The Psychology of Criminal Conduct” by D.A. Andrews and James Bonta.

Similar asked questions:
1. What should be the punishment for a juvenile offender who committed a heinous crime?
2. How effective are rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents?
3. How does age impact the sentencing of juvenile offenders?
4. What role does mental health play in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders?
5. Should juvenile offenders be tried in adult court or juvenile court?

In response to my colleague’s post, I agree that juveniles who have committed heinous crimes should be charged as adults. However, I also believe that it is important to consider the circumstances that led to the crime, such as mental health issues or a lack of education. Rehabilitation programs should be implemented to address these underlying issues and to prevent recidivism. Additionally, I support my colleague’s statement on the importance of age in each case involving a juvenile offender, as evidenced by cases argued before the United States Supreme Court. The books “Juvenile Delinquency: Causes and Control” and “The Psychology of Criminal Conduct” provide valuable insight into the causes of juvenile delinquency and suggest effective methods of intervention and prevention.

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?